Farm Capital Expenditures Fall Significantly

15249445397_fbf9ed63e1_m

by David A. Widmar

One of the first adjustments a farmer or rancher makes in light of tight financial conditions is holding off on farm capital expenditures. By running their equipment longer or using their building for a few more seasons, farmers can often defer capital investment in tough times. Because of this, capital expenditures are an important financial metric to track and observe. This week we are taking a look at the USDA’s latest estimates for farm capital expenditures.

Farm Capital Expenditures

In figure 1, farm capital expenditures – excluding operator dwellings – from 1960 to 2016 are shown in real terms (or inflation adjusted). The USDA recently forecast real farm capital expenditures in 2016 at nearly $30 billion (2009 dollars; $33.3 billion nominally). The current 2016 estimate is nearly unchanged from 2015 levels. Both of these years represent a sharp contraction from highs reached in 2014, when real farm capital expenditures reached $41.2 billion as net farm income began to soften (net farm income peaked in 2013).

Prior to the recent boom in agriculture, farm capital expenditures were substantially lower than the large capital investments made in the 1970s. Before farm financial conditions collapsed in the early 1980s, real capital expenditures reached $49.2 billion in 1979; substantially greater than recent highs. Furthermore, real capital expenditure in the 1970s were strong for several years, exceeding $40 billion five consecutive years (1976-1980).

In contrast, real farm capital expenditures in recent years exceeded $40 billion only one year (2014) and were nearly $40 billion in 2012 and 2013. In other words, the recent run-up in farm capital expenditures was smaller than those in the 1970s in both magnitude and duration.

Farm Capital Expenditures. Ag Trends. Agricultural Economic InsightsFigure 1. Real Farm Capital Expenditures (2009 USD), 1960-2016F.

Large Adjustment

From 2014 to 2015, farm capital expenditures contracted 26% (nominal values). How does this stack up to historic contractions? In figure 2, the annual change in farm capital expenditures is shown (excluding operator dwellings) from 1960 to 2016. At an annual change of nearly 27%, the contraction in 1985 was only slightly more intense than 2015. It’s worth noting, however, that the record decline in 1984 came after five years of contraction. In the most recent contraction, the large drop was the first year of decline. In fact, the decline in capital expenditures in the 1970s/1980s was persistent, lasting 7 years.

Farm Capital Expenditures. Ag Trends. Agricultural Economic InsightsFigure 2.  Annual Percentage Changes in U.S. Farm Capital Expenditures, 1960 – 2016F (nominal). Data Source: USDA ERS.

Changes by Category

In addition to the total estimates, the USDA also provides estimates of farm capital expenditures by category. The category breakdowns are available as recent as 2015 and changes from 2014 to 2015 are shown in figure 3.

For vehicles and machinery – tractors, trucks, automobiles, and other machinery – changes ranged from -25% for automobiles to -32% for ‘other machinery.’ Overall, vehicle and machinery expenditures down significantly and across the board.

The other main categories of capital expenditures – buildings and land improvements – were both 16% lower in 2015. At this point, it seems building and land improvement expenditures have been slower to contract.

Farm Capital Expenditures. Ag Trends. Agricultural Economic InsightsFigure 3. Change in Farm Capital Expenditure for Select Categories, 2015 vs 2014. Data Source: USDA ERS.

Looking Ahead

A natural question when considering these data is what a “normal” level of farm capital expenditures might be. Real capital expenditures have been on an upward trend since the late 1980s (figure 1) making a “normal” level difficult to define. However, from 1990 to 2003 real farm capital expenditures were fairly stable at a period average of $20.1 billion (ranging from $17.3 billion to $23.7 billion). Current real capital expenditures ($29.9 billion) is still considerably greater than these prior “normal” levels. More precisely, a return to 1990-2003 levels would be a 31% decline from current 2016 levels and a 50% drop from the highs reached in 2014.

Wrapping it Up

The USDA recently estimated a sharp decline in farm capital expenditures. The latest estimates reveal a sharp drop in investments in 2015, a decline much greater than initially forecasted when Brent first looked at these data a year ago. The declines in farm capital expenditures in 2015 was a magnitude only slightly smaller than the largest drop of the 1980s.

Recent declines in farm investment, in our view, underscores the financial difficultly that producers are facing and highlights the challenges that ag manufactures and retailers are facing in the current financial environment.

While the current estimates show a near status-quo outlook for farm capital investments in 2016, it’s very possible these estimates will adjust. The argument for lower capital expenditure in 2016 could easily be made given the USDA’s estimate for lower net farm income and lower cash receipts across grain and livestock production.

Interested in learning more? Follow the Agricultural Economic Insights’ Blog as we track and monitors these trends throughout the years.  Also, follow AEI on Twitter and Facebook.

 

Photo by Johnny Klemme

 

Rates of Return in U.S. Agriculture

9621028933_dee5a3680f_m

by Brent Gloy

Most of those involved in agriculture understand that farming can be a volatile business, with wide swings in profitability and earnings. But just how wide are those swings and on average what should one expect in terms of a return for their investment in agricultural assets? This week we take a look at the historical experience of the rate of return on assets in agriculture. Continue reading

Big Adjustments: The Latest USDA Net Farm Income Estimates

barn

by David A. Widmar

The USDA recently released the latest estimates of sector-level net farm income. These data provide an overall measure of the economic and financial conditions of the agricultural sector. The latest forecast revealed a much higher forecast of net farm income than previously estimated. Those who regularly monitor these data – as Brent and I do – were surprised by the large, upward adjustment to sector income. This week we take a look at the latest data, the adjustments, and the implications moving forward. Continue reading